search

swe-zzf / owasp-esapi-java

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/owasp-esapi-java
Other
0 stars 1 forks source link

Review Access Control packages #107

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
There is no javadoc package description (package.html) for the 2 access
control related packages, org.owasp.esapi.reference.accesscontrol and
org.owasp.esapi.reference.accesscontrol.policyloader. (Note that all the
other ESAPI packages have a package description.)

Related, but lower priority is that most of the classes in these two
packages have no javadoc.

If these packages are not quite ready for prime time, yet we feel we want
to leave them in place, I suggest that we write a package level description
that labels them as "experimental" and warn that they should not be used
for production level software.

I'm not really sure who to assign this to. Mike Fauzy is listed as the
author of most of these classes, but he doesn't show up in the list of
those I can assign it to (unless he is 'kfealz'??) below for either Owner
or Cc. I found Jeff's name listed as co-author for one class so I'm making
him the unlucky stuckee.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by kevin.w.wall@gmail.com on 6 Feb 2010 at 4:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Added Component-Docs as label.

Original comment by kevin.w.wall@gmail.com on 6 Feb 2010 at 4:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Beta software being dumped on ESAPI is very frustrating.We should resolve this 
in some way before 2.0GA.

Original comment by manico.james@gmail.com on 2 Nov 2010 at 7:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by manico.james@gmail.com on 2 Nov 2010 at 7:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by manico.james@gmail.com on 4 Nov 2010 at 3:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by manico.james@gmail.com on 19 Nov 2010 at 2:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Renaming this since GA 2.0 has shipped

Original comment by j...@manico.net on 5 Jul 2014 at 6:16