Closed dvzrv closed 4 years ago
It seems lv2lint is right about the Worker extension which is really no longer needed (fixed here https://github.com/swesterfeld/spectmorph/commit/db96a7de56563f5a06689192abd3b6c51276af09).
I believe the [FAIL] Symbols are false positive - I filed this here https://github.com/OpenMusicKontrollers/lv2lint/issues/4 - i.e. SpectMorph is correct and lv2lint is wrong.
Finally the [FAIL] Toolkit doesn't happen here (with lv2lint from git). I think you are responsible for this one by calling
LV2_PATH="${PWD}" lv2lint "http://spectmorph.org/plugins/spectmorph"
If you do it without setting LV2_PATH, the [FAIL] goes away.
As for the [WARN] entries, this seems more like a matter of taste than a real technical problem. Btw, the statically linked generic linux 64bit binaries from spectmorph.org don't have the [WARN] Linking warnings. However I am not sure if for a linux distribution fully statically linked lv2 plugins would be what you want to have.
Thanks for looking into this!
If you do it without setting LV2_PATH, the [FAIL] goes away.
Hm, without giving it the location, lv2lint will try /usr/lib/lv2 and then quit.
If you do it without setting LV2_PATH, the [FAIL] goes away.
Hm, without giving it the location, lv2lint will try /usr/lib/lv2 and then quit.
Ok, try
LV2_PATH="$LV2_PATH:$PWD" lv2lint ...
or
LV2_PATH="/usr/lib/lv2:$PWD" lv2lint ...
In any case the lv2lint author confirmed that the two [FAIL] Symbols needs fixing in lv2lint. So there is nothing more for me to fix in SpectMorph, I'll close the issue.
Hi! When packaging 0.5.1 for Arch Linux I ran lv2lint on the lv2 plugin:
However, there are errors (and warnings):
Note, I'm running lv2lint on the plugin before the files are installed into the "filesystem" using fakeroot (hence the first error message I assume, but I also don't know if this is a error message that will make lv2lint fail or not).