search

swicg / activitypub-e2ee

Coordination of work on end-to-end encryption with ActivityPub
20 stars 0 forks source link

Bridgeable #12

Open evanp opened 6 months ago

evanp commented 6 months ago

"As an ActivityPub user, I can send encrypted messages through a bridge to Bluesky users, so that we can communicate across protocols."

evanp commented 5 months ago

This is a real stretch of a user story. It would be nice to get this kind of interaction, though.

nightpool commented 5 months ago

what would this even look like on the bluesky side? Do they support e2ee?

On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 8:47 PM Evan Prodromou @.***> wrote:

This is a real stretch of a user story. It would be nice to get this kind of interaction, though.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-e2ee/issues/12#issuecomment-2169031534, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABZCV5MYLIQBCCNTJO4XA3ZHOMJPAVCNFSM6AAAAABIPI23DOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNRZGAZTCNJTGQ . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

evanp commented 5 months ago

what would this even look like on the bluesky side? Do they support e2ee?

So, I think the idea is that we'll use an abstract protocol, like MLS or OTR, with ActivityPub as the lower-level protocol. If BlueSky uses the same abstract protocol we do, a bridge could copy and restructure the messages without decrypting them, passing them along to the other side.