Open ThisIsMissEm opened 1 day ago
added just now
@dmitrizagidulin @capjamesg em is leading a TF now and a frequent scribe, she should prolly have privileges as well? it's all git so i'm not too worried about abuse (much less abuse that doesn't get noticed or reverted), i think we should hand out privvies to anyone who's ever scribed twice :D
and for any one-time scribers, is the preferred method a PR on this repo? should we write down this kind of stuff in a... what's it called... CG charter? 😉
Just require approval to merge to the main branch. The reason I started putting notes into the w3c wiki was because we were taking them, but never actually doing anything with them and the wiki is a place I can edit.
I assume @evanp has all the links to the historical issue triage meeting notes. I'd have to search my browser history for hedgedocs or something to find them.
Can we submit the notes in PRs that we can then merge? I am cognizant that as we add new task forces and new people come in to help with existing ones, adding people with more permissions has an administrative overhead.
I don't particularly want to maintain a fork of this repo just to upload meeting notes tbh, especially not when I can just add them to the wiki easily.
Only added this because @bumblefudge said he didn't have the most recent notes & I still had the hedgedocs link open
@bumblefudge since you've access, here's the markdown notes: