swicg / potential-charters

Discussion of potential CG and WG charters
2 stars 6 forks source link

feat: add scope of work #22

Open evanp opened 2 weeks ago

evanp commented 2 weeks ago

I added what I think is a minimal scope of work:

I'd recommend merging this PR and making additional changes afterwards.

Closes #16

evanp commented 2 weeks ago

This is for #16

evanp commented 2 weeks ago

OK, I changed "editor's drafts" to "corrected drafts", per @gobengo 's request.

I want to note that we have multiple group resolutions to maintain an "editor's draft". As long as we understand the equivalence, I'm OK with the change.

https://github.com/swicg/meetings/blob/main/RESOLUTIONS.md

bumblefudge commented 2 weeks ago

Perhaps the solution to ^this knock-on problem is to mention it during today's call... and take a resolution to start calling them "Corrected drafts" going forward (which will thus appear in the list of Resolutions when the meeting gets minuted😄

evanp commented 1 week ago

I don't agree with the modification to the language around the OWL ontology. Although it is non-normative, it is one of the published outputs from the WG and needs maintenance, just like the others.

https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#non-normative-ontology-definition