Open evanp opened 2 weeks ago
Looks like it is twice here https://github.com/swicg/potential-charters/blob/main/ap-maintenance-wg-charter.html#L81
What do you want to see to resolve the issue? It seems like an observation. I'd support the removal of the quoted text if it was a PR.
otoh I also think it'd be fine to leave it in. One could interpret it as allowing the WG to publish Notes, which I don't think is inherently a bad idea. Do you want the charter to forbid working on any Notes?
If this is a maintenance-only wg, we should take out "Notes" because there are no Notes to maintain.
If it's not a maintenance-only wg, we should allow it to create Notes, yes.
The scope in the AP-only WG charter says "as well as related Notes". I don't think we have any related Notes.