Open aciidgh opened 7 years ago
1. It shouldn't fail.
I can't see what this would have to do with the updated Clang, though.
I don't know why we never shipped doc file. @ddunbar is there a reason or should we just start doing that?
No good reason, let's start. Still seems like it might be worth understanding why this fails.
Yep, would like to keep the bug open. Need to get my hands on a 14.04 system, though.
I used this image on vmware: http://releases.ubuntu.com/14.04/ubuntu-14.04.5-server-amd64.iso
Let me know if I can provide any other information. This could be very annoying for Swift 4 users on release.
Filed https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5802 for the package manager.
@swift-ci create
Environment
swift-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2017-08-21-a-ubuntu14.04Additional Detail from JIRA
| | | |------------------|-----------------| |Votes | 1 | |Component/s | Compiler | |Labels | Bug, Linux, Serialization | |Assignee | None | |Priority | Medium | md5: 741e76216c715a881c7f217db42ea78cIssue Description:
Importing a module without its swiftdoc fails on Ubuntu 14.04 if clang is updated using apt-get. This doesn't happen on macOS or Ubuntu 16.04. This is what I did:
This works on all platform:
This fails on Ubuntu 14.04 with clang from apt-get but works on Ubuntu 16.04/macOS:
The Package Manager does not ship swiftdoc file for the PackageDescription module in the toolchain, should it start doing so? What about the existing toolchains?
https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-users/Week-of-Mon-20170828/006111.html