Open ewallace opened 2 years ago
To include:
In branch further-reading-section-16 I have added a further reading section at the bottom.
I tried to follow the format set out in the example "Beginner's guide to CRISPR-Cas9 based gene editing" and have added the items listed here:
To include:
- UNESCO on open science
- Five selfish reasons to work reproducibly.
- riboviz 2 paper
- riboviz website - or maybe the doi for the software?
- Something on iGEM MSc projects?
- The Carpentries materials for teaching foundational skills in coding & data science.
- The Mountain of Engagement citation from Citation for "mountain of engagement"? #11
For the riboviz website item I included the reference for the riboviz software and its doi - if this is incorrect I can change it.
Unless any other resources are to be added should I put in a pull request @ewallace?
This looks good. It's ready for a pull request.
Can we add some further reading on git and github for researchers? I'll look around for that. I'll also create a new issue ticket that we need a 1-sentence explanation of git/github/issue tickets when it's first brought up in the article, because many readers of the biochemist might be unfamiliar with those.
Can we edit: "For Carpentries" > "The Carpentries, organisation and materials teaching coding skills to researcher" "For iGEM MSc projects" - I should have explained that better. You've put in a link to iGEM. I was hoping there might be some link or explanation to using iGEM for MSc research projects. Should I ask e.g. Holly Robertson-Dick about that?
@FlicAnderson do you have any other ideas about resources we should add?
Let's add: Ten arguments against Open Science That you can win: https://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2020-12-17-ten-arguments-against-open-science-you-can-win
@FlicAnderson and @swinterbourne will work to resolve this pull request #23, then we will close this issue.
@ewallace to follow up with Holly Robertson-Dick about iGEM for MSc Research re: above comment
Updated by @ewallace: I emailed Holly Robertson-Dick and Elise Cachat to ask for a reference.
main
, but we're not closing this issue just yet until we decide whether we should add some reading resources on GitHub.We tossed a few ideas back and forth:
https://github.blog/2014-05-14-improving-github-for-science/ - a blog post on using github in science (probably too short & not general enough?)
https://guides.github.com/activities/hello-world/ - this is a tutorial, with a 'what is github' section at the start, but perhaps linking to a tutorial is a bit much if people just want more information about what github is?
https://unito.io/blog/beginners-guide-to-github/ - this is a fairly good guide to the different features of GitHub, but assumes familiarity with Git & is aimed at folks about to use GitHub, not people new to the concept, I think. This alternative guide is aimed at non-developers, but the 'project managers' title might put off non-developer non-project-managers?: https://unito.io/blog/guide-to-github-for-project-managers/
Also:
this might be a good reading resource for 'Git':
https://guides.github.com/introduction/git-handbook/ - Git handbook
This might be something people reading for review (#20) might suggest, so perhaps it's worth keeping these ideas in mind?
I think iGEM link more informative to go directly to:
Student projects connected to the iGEM competition https://igem.org/Competition
I have updated the iGEM link in the branch further-reading-16.
Should I add any of the links that Flic mentioned in this comment before I merge it in?
Thanks @swinterbourne! I think add:
Then pull request in?
We need to make a Further Reading section, and strip citations/links from the text. See for example Beginner’s guide to CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing.
From Instructions to Authors: