the examples including collections use c(0, 10, 100)
imo c(1, 10, 100) is a better value for two reasons
0 is like no-op and can lead to confusion sometimes.
For e.g., I was going thru recycling example and it said that when the collection lengths are not integral multiples of each other a warning is shown but recycling is still done.
The example in this c(1,2,3,4) + c(0, 10, 100) and the output was 1 12 103 4. I immediately had a doubt here, did recycling happen or not? I can't infer it 100% for the value 4 which remains unchanged.
using c(1, 10, 100) immediatelty clicks as 10^0, 10^1, 10^2
I havent looked over the reposityory thoroughly so If you could point to me where the example values are stored, I would be happy to submit a PR.
P.S might be a good idea to label this as suggestion
the examples including collections use
c(0, 10, 100)imoc(1, 10, 100)is a better value for two reasons0is like no-op and can lead to confusion sometimes. For e.g., I was going thrurecyclingexample and it said that when the collection lengths are not integral multiples of each other a warning is shown butrecyclingis still done. The example in thisc(1,2,3,4) + c(0, 10, 100)and the output was1 12 103 4. I immediately had a doubt here, did recycling happen or not? I can't infer it 100% for the value4which remains unchanged.using
c(1, 10, 100)immediatelty clicks as10^0,10^1,10^2I havent looked over the reposityory thoroughly so If you could point to me where the example values are stored, I would be happy to submit a PR.
P.S might be a good idea to label this as
suggestionThnx for your work! :)