Closed simonmeyerm closed 1 week ago
Feedback on behalf of UBS: We have a neutral view: not against, nor in favor of it, but would support this proposal since it’s a purely cosmetic change. This is a matter of preference and other ordering criteria are equally valid.
All SFTI API specifications will follow the proposed naming conventions. For more details please see here: https://github.com/swissfintechinnovations/.github/wiki/Naming-Conventions. Therefore this issue will be closed.
Close of issue without implementation has been approved by the working group.
Would it makes sense to order the Headers, Paths and Queries in a defined order for all APIs?
bLink suggestion would be to arrange it alphabetically with:
For bLink the order would look like this: