swsch / strongtalk

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/strongtalk
0 stars 0 forks source link

Get running under GCC and other GNU tools #10

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This is the first baby step to being able to port the system.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by David.Gr...@gmail.com on 22 Sep 2006 at 9:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Done.

Compiled r36-noasm3 using mingw32-3.4.4

One issue is that GCC misses empty base class optimisations sometimes, so some
changes will be needed to guard against it. For instance, global cache lookups.

The interpreter looks stable. Compiled code shows worse stability, i suppose 
because
of wrong layout assumptions (empty base classes shifting the layout of all 
subclasses)

Original comment by prunedt...@gmail.com on 30 Apr 2007 at 2:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Here is r36-noasm4, compiles under GCC 4.1 on debian etch, with the exception of
os_*.cpp files

Original comment by prunedt...@gmail.com on 23 May 2007 at 10:32

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Do the new crashes that occur happen in the compiler itself, the compiled code, 
or
elsewhere in the VM?  Although the compiler is the hardest part of the system 
to work
on, it would be very nice to have a deterministic (script based) test that fails
under the new system but not under the old one.  That might help a lot in 
determining
the problem, since otherwise a new compiler bug might be very hard to isolate.  
But
it might be a while before we have the expertise to do much hacking on the 
compiler.

Original comment by David.Gr...@gmail.com on 24 May 2007 at 8:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Er, I can't download this file either. Prunedtree, could you please upload it
somewhere again?

Original comment by vincent....@gmail.com on 14 Sep 2007 at 1:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
ok, it's alright now. I have managed to download it (after about 10 attempts).  

Original comment by vincent....@gmail.com on 14 Sep 2007 at 2:52