Open swtan346 opened 5 months ago
Thank you for reporting. However, we have to choose it as NotInScope because this issue doesn't affect the current usage of the product and is not actually a flaw. First, we are instructed that putting significant features that need more elaboration into the DG's implementation detail section is enough. However, the implementation details for Medical Management are very simple. It is not a significant feature that needs to be documented in very much detail. Elaborating more on this (as well as other very similar features such as patient management and contact management) would make the DG extremely long. The reality is, some people might prefer concise and simple explanations, while others might prefer the opposite. It is very hard to satisfy all reader's tastes. We might want to consider adding more implementation details for this feature in the DG in future iterations, but providing the work we have already done, the proposed issue is not in the scope.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: Medical information management constitutes a significant aspect of VitalConnect, supported by numerous features. Therefore, it's not accurate to deem the implementation trivial. Furthermore, the team could have provided an overview of each feature, allowing readers to skip details if they feel that the overview is sufficient. Hence, omitting the implementation of medical information management entirely may not be justified.
It would be good to add the implementation details for the feature for Medical Information Management.