Open swvanderlaan opened 6 years ago
Read the total lines of the .errors file if that's possible.
Variants that are not in the reference are now counted properly. On the other hand, variants that are uninformative can be counted twice. Like in the example ERROR
output below:
* For chr4:69501357:T_TAGAG there is information from one study or none -- so skipping this variant.
* For chr4:69501357:T_TAGAG the effective sample size = 0 -- so skipping this variant.
This results in it counting 2 uninformative variants skipped, despite the fact that these are just 2 errors for the same variant.
In the summary of the meta-analysis (below) there is a total tally of variants per category. However, this seems to be a bit of (error file reports many more variants that were not found in the reference) and therefore needs double checking.
Example
error
-file output:In this example there 4,856 variants skipped. But these are not reported in the summary below as uninformative or something.
Example summary: