@deborahferguson got the error message with a CCE run and admittedly it wasn't super clear. I think this is somewhat of an improvement, but could still probably use some work. The tricky bit is that there are a lot of reasons why the code could go unstable and result in a tiny time step size :(
Upgrade instructions
Code review checklist
[ ] The code is documented and the documentation renders correctly. Run
make doc to generate the documentation locally into BUILD_DIR/docs/html.
Then open index.html.
[ ] The code follows the stylistic and code quality guidelines listed in the
code review guide.
[ ] The PR lists upgrade instructions and is labeled bugfix or
new feature if appropriate.
Proposed changes
@deborahferguson got the error message with a CCE run and admittedly it wasn't super clear. I think this is somewhat of an improvement, but could still probably use some work. The tricky bit is that there are a lot of reasons why the code could go unstable and result in a tiny time step size :(
Upgrade instructions
Code review checklist
make doc
to generate the documentation locally intoBUILD_DIR/docs/html
. Then openindex.html
.bugfix
ornew feature
if appropriate.Further comments