Lagrange multiplier graphs for Becca to look at

[rebeccamccabe]

If a constraint is active for certain designs, then that constraint has a non-zero lagrange multiplier for certain other designs. The problem is that the designs that have active constraints are not necessarily the designs that have the non-zero lagrange multipliers.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.52941% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.43%. Comparing base (49bee41) to head (fcf6f12). Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

:exclamation: Current head fcf6f12 differs from pull request most recent head 152fd8a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 152fd8a to get more accurate results

Files	Patch %	Lines
mdocean/optimization/gradient_optim.m	75.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #41 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 78.69% 79.43% +0.74% ========================================== Files 37 37 Lines 1577 1634 +57 ========================================== + Hits 1241 1298 +57 Misses 336 336 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rebeccamccabe]

for the most part, which constraints are active is consistent between the two ways of plotting, but the number on the x-axis is not consistent.

[rebeccamccabe]

First count number of constraints and get confident on whether it's a reordering issue on the x-axis or some other issue in computation. If it's a reordering issue, look in the generator folder and see if there's a way that the constraints are getting reordered.