Closed wouterj closed 7 years ago
@dbu @ElectricMaxxx please give you opinion on:
The method renamings from #44 were applied immediately. We might want to release 1.1.1 that triggers deprecations for these? (focus point for the RC phase)
@wouterj you whant to release 1.1.1 where you mark the methods as deprecated, which you remove here for 2.0? If that is the plan, i think it is valid.
@ElectricMaxxx yes, indeed. It's not fully according to what we've done in other bundles, but otherwise we'll have to wait with the method renamings till 3.0, which seems a long way...
+1 for the changes. with the 1.1.1 version i dont mind. i assume the number of people using those methods is not huge, so we can do without imho
fix #79, #81, #44
The method renamings from #44 were applied immediately. We might want to release 1.1.1 that triggers deprecations for these? (focus point for the RC phase)