When dealing with objects of type BipElt or BipFunction, we have the is_user_name property.
However, when working with objects of type HxLvar, the semantically identical property is called has_user_name instead.
In addition, BipElt and BipFunction provide some useful utility methods such as is_ida_name, is_dummy_name, etc. that are not exposed for HxLvar objects.
Is it possible to create a more consistent API between objects of different types?
Thanks!
Hi,
When dealing with objects of type
BipEltorBipFunction, we have theis_user_nameproperty. However, when working with objects of typeHxLvar, the semantically identical property is calledhas_user_nameinstead. In addition,BipEltandBipFunctionprovide some useful utility methods such asis_ida_name,is_dummy_name, etc. that are not exposed forHxLvarobjects.Is it possible to create a more consistent API between objects of different types? Thanks!