search

synapsecns / sanguine

Synapse Monorepo
MIT License
43 stars 31 forks source link

feat(rfq-relayer): forward bridge requests in new goroutine #3276

Closed dwasse closed 1 month ago

dwasse commented 1 month ago

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai[bot] commented 1 month ago

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily focus on the handleBridgeRequestedLog method within the Relayer struct in services/rfq/relayer/service/handlers.go. The lock management during bridge request processing has been modified to prevent race conditions by introducing a boolean flag for controlling the mutex unlock timing. Enhancements to error handling and logging have been implemented, improving traceability. Minor adjustments to comments and code structure were made, but the core logic remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
services/rfq/relayer/service/handlers.go Modified handleBridgeRequestedLog method to improve lock management and introduced a shouldUnlock flag. Enhanced error handling and logging. Minor adjustments to comments and structure. Method signatures updated but logic remains unchanged.

Poem

In the meadow where bunnies hop,
Locks and logs take a little stop.
With a flag to guide the way,
No more race in the fray!
Hooray for changes, bright and new,
A smoother path for me and you! 🐇✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
codecov[bot] commented 1 month ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (master@e74153c). Learn more about missing BASE report. Report is 49 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
services/rfq/relayer/service/handlers.go 0.00000% 13 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #3276 +/- ## ============================================ Coverage ? 24.99618% ============================================ Files ? 198 Lines ? 13074 Branches ? 82 ============================================ Hits ? 3268 Misses ? 9526 Partials ? 280 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3276/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [opbot](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3276/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | `0.48870% <ø> (?)` | | | [promexporter](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3276/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | `6.81642% <ø> (?)` | | | [rfq](https://app.codecov.io/gh/synapsecns/sanguine/pull/3276/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns) | `24.61353% <0.00000%> (?)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=synapsecns#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

cloudflare-workers-and-pages[bot] commented 1 month ago

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 42893f0
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://29c25840.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://feat-relayer-fwd.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs