Closed ashuralyk closed 1 year ago
@jjyr I'm refactoring ckb4ibc-test framework, I'm afraid it has impact on your current work of testing Axon Endpoints, so please check this PR
@Flouse I have completed the coding of packet test case embedded in ckb4ibc-test
and successfully sent SendPacket
transaction, but the next process was stuck due to the monitor logic of relayer I guess, so the next stage is to debug and make test case pass through, @blckngm could help me do this if you have your leisure time
@blckngm packet cell has successfully searched on chain_a, but the next problem is in query_channel
method, it accepted channel-1
which is not existed on chain_a
@blckngm current issue is blocked when searching RecvPacket through SDK, please take a moment to look at it https://github.com/synapseweb3/forcerelay-ckb-sdk/issues/7
@blckngm after using the latest revision of forcerelay-ckb-sdk, the CI process has stuck in searching AckPacket cell on chain-a https://github.com/synapseweb3/forcerelay/actions/runs/6008594876/job/16296503004?pr=305, so please take a look at it
It's still related to cursor usage. Use https://github.com/synapseweb3/forcerelay-ckb-sdk/tree/temp-fix-cursor for now.
@blckngm @Flouse @jjyr I have already passed ckb4ibc-test
CI test locally which contains packet relaying test in ckb <-> ckb case, I think it's ok to prepare a code review
@jjyr please help me check it out, I got nothing from my failed CI and I found its processing list is different from yours, so have you done something on it in your PR ?
https://github.com/synapseweb3/forcerelay/actions/runs/6012440875/job/16329029412?pr=305
LGTM.
We should merge #308 before this PR, #308 upgrade the integration-test CI and the implement Axon <-> CKB channel tests, it can gurantee this PR do not break the CI.
Then we rebase this PR and rewrite the packet test.
what's your recommend on merging this PR? my opinion is to start a new branch and move essential changes of packet test into it from this PR, do you recommend just merging it exactly after rebasing?
@Flouse the next operation of coding to do in ibc-test
is the following:
@jjyr suggestions in comments are applied
background:
change log:
*_type_args
config values from test-framework cratetype_args
totype_hash
for security concernsspecific_test_only_for_ckb
p.s.
integration-test
->ica-filter-test
seems cannot be fixed until we merge Hermes v1.6.0, it seems has pre-packed nix package that only matches latest Hermes version, which would cause failure while using previous version of Hermes framework