search

syncloud / platform

Run popular services on your device with one click
https://syncloud.org
GNU General Public License v3.0
396 stars 40 forks source link

Joplin app #524

Open sttrebo opened 4 years ago

sttrebo commented 4 years ago

I have been using Joplin a while now instead of the Notes app. it's a bit more powerful and has additional features that make it a nice Evernote alternative. I was currious if there was a way to get it running on Syncloud. Since Syncloud is Debian based, I found this article. Granted this talks about Rasberry Pi and I'm not sure of the differences, but would love to see this if it's doable.

thanks

cyberb commented 4 years ago

Looks good, if you want you can help us you can try porting it using our docs here: https://github.com/syncloud/platform/wiki/App-porting-guide and I can help you.

sttrebo commented 4 years ago

i'll give it a shot, thanks for the help. i did find that there is already a snap package available for it. i'm assuming i can start with that and modify it?

cyberb commented 4 years ago

more or less, there are few differences like we do not use snapcraft high level build tool Added a section about it: https://github.com/syncloud/platform/wiki/App-porting-guide#syncloud-snap-package-building-differences

cyberb commented 1 year ago

This app does not really have a backend, it can save to various backends like nextcloud. Not sure what can we do, we help with automating backends with or without web installs.

If someone can find a good backend/server app for jopling we can reopen it.

sttrebo commented 1 year ago

sorry, never seem to have the time to try it myself. but here is a link to their server app info.
Joplin server maybe worth a look? if not, i've been using it with my nextcloud install and it's been pretty flawless.

cyberb commented 1 year ago

ok, there is a server: https://github.com/laurent22/joplin/tree/dev/packages/server Google found few screenshots but it looks like it is very basic for syncing the notes, does not have any ldap looks like.

sttrebo commented 1 year ago

correct, there was some discussions a year ago or so to implement this SSO but i think it was put on hold as being too much effort to do/maintain. not sure if there's a workaround for this unfortunately.