Closed zregvart closed 7 years ago
This would generate a little bit of inconsistency in secrets as it would result in something like:
twitter-mention-connector.clientId = ...
twitter-mention-connector.clisnetSecret = ...
salesforce-upsert-sobject.configurations.salesforce-upsert-sobject-1.userName = ...
salesforce-upsert-sobject.configurations.salesforce-upsert-sobject-1.password = ...
salesforce-upsert-sobject.configurations.salesforce-upsert-sobject-2.userName = ...
salesforce-upsert-sobject.configurations.salesforce-upsert-sobject-2.password = ...
So there is something that uses the configurations
syntax and something not, is that ok ?
Any thoughts on the comment above @iocanel @jimmidyson @rhuss @KurtStam?
@lburgazzoli I think that would be ok, as most integrations I think would use only single connection.
If Zoran's solution looks ok I can work on this tomorrow (so it can solve #660)
Our component aliases currently contain connectionId, which is not too user friendly (for example
twitter-mention-connector--KuYUr3kEMhDH0Nq8VGV
). We could generate aliases by following two simple rulesThis should lead to component aliases that look something like this in the generated
syndesis.yml
: