Open Zabrane opened 2 years ago
base
and rt
are going to be a prototypes of a replacement for kernel
and stdlib
.
is rt ets.erl
faster than the stock ets.erl
?
ets.erl
is going to be a thing with minimal changes to original. maybe some API reduction.
Or if you have a candidate to replacement I can take a look.
No, i'm fine with your ets.erl
. It's already minimalistic.
Still some functions are missing. Eg ets:foldl/3
, ets:foldr/3
So do you really like an idea to have own base and kernel ?
So do you really like an idea to have own base and kernel ?
Definitely YES. Get rid of bloated modules and keeping a minimalistic base/kernel modules is great.
@5HT Happy New Year. Any progress on this :-)?
@5HT How one can use this ets.erl NIF based module and avoid conflict with
ets.erl
shipped with the VM? Could you please provide an example usage? Many thanks