search

syntax-prosody-ot / main

A webapp for the syntax-prosody analyst working in Optimality Theory, with automated Gen, Con and Eval. Download build files from syntax-prosody-ot/build
https://spot.sites.ucsc.edu/
GNU General Public License v2.0
12 stars 2 forks source link

Re-ordering markedness constraint sections #519

Closed nkalivoda closed 3 years ago

nkalivoda commented 3 years ago

I think it would make sense to put "Ordering" at the bottom of the constraint section, since it's not relevant witth default GEN. Is this okay?

I think otherwise the order of sections is good. Basically in order of how often they're used.

jbellik commented 3 years ago

Sounds good.

On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 6:35 AM Nick Kalivoda notifications@github.com wrote:

I think it would make sense to put "Ordering" at the bottom of the constraint section, since it's not relevant witth default GEN. Is this okay?

I think otherwise the order of sections is good. Basically in order of how often they're used.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/syntax-prosody-ot/main/issues/519, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC7ROKWTOOWFYOM2S7QEGSDSTJAJ5ANCNFSM4UOSZDEA .

--

-- Jennifer Bellik, PhD Post-doctoral researcher & lecturer UC Santa Cruz https://people.ucsc.edu/~jbellik/

jbellik commented 3 years ago

I just implemented this and then reverted the change, because I remembered that the reason we put it where it is is because it's ultimately a mapping constraint. Hence it's at the bottom of the list of mapping constraints, rather than the bottom of the list of markedness constraints. Adding macro-sections, as you put it, will clarify this.

nkalivoda commented 3 years ago

Yes, you're right, sorry about that!