Closed carlo-fiorina closed 1 year ago
Hello, Thanks for finding this. Because of the work around I had for using the base radiation model the dictionary wasn't actually being read. The fix should be coming today though.
Thanks, Jeff
Thanks! I'll test as soon as I have the chance
Hi, I am a professor at Texas A&M and I would like use blastFoam in a project related to gas dynamics in fusion reactors. First of all, congrats for the amazing job and thanks for having shared this. For the moment, I have found just one small issue. I have tried to use a P1 radiation model. When I set up the radiationProperties dictionary, the solver says that the blastAbsorptionEmissionModels keyword is missing even when the keyword is there. I have looked into the code and the problem appears to be in the initialize() function in blastRadiationModel.C. Somehow (*this) fails in passing to the various functions the content of the radiationProperties dictionary (you can try to Info it). An inelegant workaround is to re-declare the dictionary (see code at the end of the message), but maybe someone more familiar with blastFoam and its structure could come up with a better solution. Worst case scenario, the proposed fix makes things work at least. Hope this helps.