Closed jonrkarr closed 2 years ago
Todo
manual-fixes
subdirectory of this repository. Describe any corrections to the curation notes here.@jonrkarr The curation notes and figure reflect Figure 1b on page 4 of the Grigolon et al. paper.
How can I render the SED-ML file to determine whether it describes this proper figure? My executions of the COPASI file do not recreate the figures from either the curation or the paper.
The SED-ML files can be opened with COPASI. But, the COPASI files are fine to use too because the SED-ML files are derived from the COPASI files.
The only figure that is generated from a Time Course
task of the COPASI file
Grigolon2018_fig1b.pdf
matches neither any of the curation figures nor any figures from the paper.
I also receive this error when I load the SED-ML file into COPASI which suggests that the corresponding SBML file not accessible to the SED-ML file.
Are these files broken, or must a different COPASI task be run?
I think everything is fine. I'm going to close this issue shortly once I explore the COPASI bug described below.
The COPASI file (Grigolon2018_fig1b.cps) does produce the plots in the curation notes. The plot is from a parameter scan.
The SED-ML file (Grigolon2018_fig1b.sedml) is also close to capturing these plots. The one exception is that COPASI (v4.30) has a bug which leads it to import the wrong number of steps of the repeated task (a number much bigger than 1000). I'm going to try this with the latest version of COPASI and see if an bug report still should be filed, or this has been fixed.
The COPASI warnings are substantially reduced to just 1 in the latest version (4.35).
The number of steps of the repeated task is also now imported correctly with COPASI 4.35. Thus, no error needs to be reported to COPASI.
The SBML and SED-ML appear to be associated with Baker et al., where as the curators notes appear to be associated with Grigolon et al.