Closed efullea closed 11 years ago
Invalid. There may be a gap before the first tone.
What is the reason / use case?
You may have just stopped a tone. We don't control system latency, so the gap may be needed before the first tone.
Agree with @zolkis. Makes sense that the underlying system would control the gap before the next send.
But that is not a reason to delay the start of all first tones in a sequence. If we say it is the gap after the tones, both cases are fulfilled, i.e. no delay in the first tone and we make sure that there is a gap between sequences of tones.
It does not delay the start of all first tones, only when specified. If not specified, the system controls it. Usually in such cases the gap is specified before the tones, not after, since the danger is that we mess with the previous tone. If it is the the user who specifies 0 gap and it messes up, it is his/her responsibility. But 0 gap should not be the default policy.
Check http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/101200_101299/10123502/01.01.01_60/ts_10123502v010101p.pdf
4.2.4.2: "Where the DTMF signalling pause duration is controlled automatically by the transmitter the duration of the pause between any individual DTMF tone combination shall not be less than 65 ms. The time shall be measured from the time when the tone has dropped to 10 % of its steady-state value, until it has risen to 10 % of its steady-state value. NOTE: In order to ensure correct reception of all the digits in a network address sequence, some networks may require a sufficient pause after the last DTMF digit signalled and before normal transmission starts"
But there is no way to control a previous tone. So the only option is to specify a pre-gap.
So it really just means the minimum delay that must have occurred before the next tone is sent by the system (even in the case of the first send). In the case of the first one, the system knows that the min gap time has passed (as it hasn't sent anything yet). So, it basically avoids a race condition and flooding the exchange (which, of course, is good).
'Represents the duration in milliseconds of the time gap (space) before a [DTMF] tone.'
should be
'Represents the duration in milliseconds of the time gap (space) between [DTMF] tones.'
to reflect that there is no gap before the first tone