Open jtomaszon opened 4 years ago
As a workaround, deleting mysql_aws_aurora_hostgroups
and just using normal mysql_replication_hostgroups
keep the things running.
We are seeing this on new clusters launched with the 5.6.mysql_aurora.1.23.0
engine version.
Como solução alternativa, excluir
mysql_aws_aurora_hostgroups
e usar apenas o normalmysql_replication_hostgroups
mantém as coisas funcionando.
But how can I control the lag of the aurora cluster replicas
Como solução alternativa, excluir
mysql_aws_aurora_hostgroups
e usar apenas o normalmysql_replication_hostgroups
mantém as coisas funcionando.But how can I control the lag of the aurora cluster replicas
Sadly you won't be able to.. The key here is, Aurora replicas won't have lag more than a tens of ms, from my experience (heavy write batches application) we never see that behavior. Max Lag will be around 30-50ms. If your application supports that kind of lag, you should be fine to keep using old
replication group
Just a disclosure, it's me and my experience saying that, not a recommendation from AWS or even ProxySQL team
tks!! @jtomaszon
Hey Team! I found an issue during a simple configuration with Aurora Cluster. The scenario:
When I connect all together, I keep receiving this error on proxySQL error logs:
No errors on
mysql_server_aws_aurora_log
table. Tried with and without add_lag_ms but still an issueProxySQL ver 2.0.14 Ubuntu package