Closed nickgerace closed 1 month ago
This PR was purely posted for history's sake. This was an idea tossed around, but is not a good one. See #4561 for more information.
EDIT: the commit has a description mistake. It should say PR #4561
(what it should be) instead of PR #4564
(mistake that's in there).
This PR is an idea for chunking data between SI services for billing events due to an unbounded field size. This idea introduces complications and does not get us closer to good data warehouse design. Thus, PR #4561 is preferred over this.
EDIT: the commit has a description mistake. It should say
PR #4561
(what it should be) instead ofPR #4564
(mistake that's in there).