Thanks for your PR, @Detsieber. Seems our work has probably overlapped - I think the approach in #180 should fix the issue, while your PR does not address all occurrences of the problem and has code style issues. Would you be able to give #180 a try instead?
Thanks for your PR, @Detsieber. Seems our work has probably overlapped - I think the approach in #180 should fix the issue, while your PR does not address all occurrences of the problem and has code style issues. Would you be able to give #180 a try instead?