search

szaghi / FLAP

Fortran command Line Arguments Parser for poor people
150 stars 34 forks source link

Compling error when building with GCC 6.4.0 #79

Closed xiaocanli closed 3 years ago

xiaocanli commented 6 years ago

Below is the log. It seems to be due to the R16 extension.

Builder options Directories Building directory: "static" Compiled-objects .o directory: "static/obj" Compiled-objects .mod directory: "static/mod" Compiler options Vendor: "gnu" Compiler command: "gfortran" Module directory switch: "-J" Compiling flags: "-cpp -c -frealloc-lhs -O2 -D_R16P_SUPPORTED" Linking flags: "" Preprocessing flags: "-D_R16P_SUPPORTED" Coverage: False Profile: False PreForM.py used: False PreForM.py output directory: None PreForM.py extensions processed: []

Building src/lib/flap.f90 Compiling src/third_party/PENF/src/lib/penf_global_parameters_variables.F90 serially Compiling src/third_party/PENF/src/lib/penf_b_size.F90 serially Compiling src/third_party/PENF/src/lib/penf_stringify.F90 serially Compiling src/third_party/PENF/src/lib/penf.F90 serially Compiling src/third_party/FACE/src/lib/face.f90 src/lib/flap_object_t.f90 src/lib/flap_utils_m.f90 using 2 concurrent processes Compiling src/lib/flap_command_line_argument_t.F90 serially src/lib/flap_command_line_argument_t.F90:52:39:

 generic,   public :: get_varying =>                &
                                   1

Error: ‘get_cla_list_varying_r16p’ and ‘get_cla_list_varying_r8p’ for GENERIC ‘get_varying’ at (1) are ambiguous (null):0: confused by earlier errors, bailing out

src/lib/flap_command_line_argument_t.F90:52:39:

 generic,   public :: get_varying =>                &
                                   1

Error: ‘get_cla_list_varying_r16p’ and ‘get_cla_list_varying_r8p’ for GENERIC ‘get_varying’ at (1) are ambiguous (null):0: confused by earlier errors, bailing out

szaghi commented 6 years ago

Dear @xiaocanli

I am sorry for my delay, this is a very busy period. I'll check this bug ASAP.

Thank you very much for pointing it out.

szaghi commented 6 years ago

Dear @xiaocanli

Later today I'll should be able to investigate this issue. Stay tuned.

AliE89 commented 3 years ago

Hello there, It's been ages, but I am getting the same under gfortran 7.5 :)

szaghi commented 3 years ago

@AliE89

Wow, I missed that this is still live, my bad.

Old versions of compilers are not supported, I am sorry, but I can try to help if the issue is not related to compilers bugs.

Commonly issues related to R16P are related to my flip/flop behavior to support 128bit real kind (due to the fact that some compilers do not support that kind). Currently, I am working a lot with NVFortran that does not support R16P thus I could have introduced some incompatibilities into my libraries.

Can you give me more details about your issue?

AliE89 commented 3 years ago

Hi Stefano,

yes it looks to be alive. I had to remove from the interface the _R16 function to make it work.

szaghi commented 3 years ago

@AliE89

I cannot try old version of GCC. Currently, I am using gcc 10.2.0 and it seems to compile well (at least by means of FoBiS).

xiaocanli commented 3 years ago

I have been using it with newer versions of gfortran and ifort without a problem (compiled using FoBis).

AliE89 commented 3 years ago

Cool, so it is me beign an erethic not using fobis XD thanks for the feedback guys

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, 16:43 Xiaocan Li, @.***> wrote:

I have been using it with newer versions of gfortran and ifort without a problem (compiled using FoBis).

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/szaghi/FLAP/issues/79#issuecomment-816733733, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL4ZV6RFFKTE6Y6T2BW7SE3TH4HBRANCNFSM4EHPJX4A .

xiaocanli commented 3 years ago

Since we will not test older versions of gfortran, I would suggest closing this old issue. @AliE89 Thanks for bringing this up! @szaghi Thanks for this great library!

AliE89 commented 3 years ago

Sure, let's close it. I have used gfortran 10.2 as well, a simpky think i am missing some definitions while using my own makefile, while fobis can configuration file can deal with it.

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021, 17:08 Xiaocan Li, @.***> wrote:

Since we will not test older versions of gfortran, I would suggest closing this old issue. @AliE89 https://github.com/AliE89 Thanks for bringing this up! @szaghi https://github.com/szaghi Thanks for this great library!

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/szaghi/FLAP/issues/79#issuecomment-816750842, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL4ZV6UF2M5NW7ZB62NWGTLTH4J7NANCNFSM4EHPJX4A .