Theorem 2

[Rainydu184]

The proof in the article is excellent, and I have a small doubt about Theorem 2. I cannot understand how the second equality implies the third equality. Furthermore, I have provided an alternative proof that demonstrates the possibility of inequality between the second and third equalities. Have I overlooked something? Please provide some assistance. Thank you!

[relyativist]

Hi, @Rainydu184, thanks for your question. Also interested in theorem proof. I assumed, that the question you placed is the log of the product to sum of logs transform.

[Rainydu184]

@relyativist Could you please provide more details further？