Closed sungmin817 closed 9 years ago
MaTeX simply applies TeXForm
to everything that is not a string, so the result you see is ultimately due to TeXForm
's behaviour. The only objects it doesn't apply TeXForm
are strings, there are no other exceptions (for now).
The argument for keeping things as they are is that this behaviour is simple and predictable.
Of course I can see why this is annoying with StringForm
. But is there any reason to use StringForm
instead of StringTemplate
with MaTeX
? Is StringTemplate["\\frac{x}{``}][3]
an acceptable workaround for you?
Thanks for the quick reply. You workaround StringTemplate["\frac{x}{``}][3] seems very nice. I simply did not know it.
Anyway, thanks for the nice package.
2015-07-29 13:27 GMT+02:00 Szabolcs Horvát notifications@github.com:
MaTeX simply applies TeXForm to everything that is not a string, so the result you see is ultimately due to TeXForm's behaviour. The only objects it doesn't apply TeXForm are strings, there are no other exceptions (for now).
The argument for keeping things as they are is that this behaviour is simple and predictable.
Of course I can see why this is annoying with StringForm. But is there any reason to use StringForm instead of StringTemplate with MaTeX? Is StringTemplate["\frac{x}{``}][3] an acceptable workaround for you?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/szhorvat/MaTeX/issues/3#issuecomment-125923686.
I thought about this and I can't find much harm in adding the exception for StringForm
while it will make the user experience a bit better.
So fixed by 527a2dabea22c17df11d017dc00cd871666f244a
To force a literal formatting of the string (the effect StringForm
had before) one can use HoldForm
. But I don't see anyone needing this anyway, given MaTeX's main focus.
Thank you for the consideration.
2015-07-29 13:54 GMT+02:00 Szabolcs Horvát notifications@github.com:
I thought about this and I can't find much harm in adding the exception for StringForm while it will make the user experience a bit better.
So fixed by 527a2da https://github.com/szhorvat/MaTeX/commit/527a2dabea22c17df11d017dc00cd871666f244a
To force a literal formatting of the string (the effect StringForm had before) one can use HoldForm. But I don't see anyone needing this anyway, given MaTeX's main focus.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/szhorvat/MaTeX/issues/3#issuecomment-125929666.
This is not an issue but a feature request and this might be just a matter of taste.
I recently found that MaTeX cannot handle StringForm correctly, e.g.,
gives an unexpected result. I know there is a very simple workaround such as
I understand that MaTeX should not have all possible overloads for arbitrary heads. However, I think StringForm is primitive enough to be considered special.