szpiech
commented
10 months ago Hello,
As some point in the past I changed it to log10. This should be noted in the changelog, but thanks for telling me it’s not updated in the manual.
Zachary
Le lun. 18 sept. 2023 à 10:52 PM, Bai-fengting @.***> a écrit :
Hello, I am using selscan v2.0.0 to calculate iHS. The sixth column of output is the unstandardized iHS. As write in paper(B. F. Voight, S. Kudaravalli, X. Wen, J. K. Pritchard, A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol 4, e72 (2006).) and selscan manual, the unstandardized iHS = ln(iHH1/iHH0) but the value calculated by selcan is log10(iHH1/iHH0). Is it because I understood it wrong or there is a selcan error? Thanks！
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/szpiech/selscan/issues/103, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABAKRQUOCXII2IBWPBEA5JDX3ECGPANCNFSM6AAAAAA45TL6MI . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hello, I am using selscan v2.0.0 to calculate iHS. The sixth column of output is the unstandardized iHS. As write in paper(B. F. Voight, S. Kudaravalli, X. Wen, J. K. Pritchard, A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol 4, e72 (2006).) and selscan manual, the unstandardized iHS = ln(iHH1/iHH0) but the value calculated by selcan is log10(iHH1/iHH0). Is it because I understood it wrong or there is a selcan error? Thanks！