I have some questions regarding the output of the iHH12 statistic:
After normalization, what does a negative score imply? If I remember correctly, for iHS meant selection on either the derived or ancestral haplotype. Is this the case with iHH12?
Should I then report the absolute value of iHH12, like in iHS and nSL?
Is prior filtering of only SNPs with ancestral/derived states needed for iHH12?
iHH12 is calculating integrated haplotype homozygosity (with top two hap classes collapsed) of the whole sample (not the ratio of the iHH or anc/der as in iHS), therefore normalized scores that are negative are just reflecting their very low iHH12 score (lots of heterozygosity among haplotypes).
No, positive scores are the important ones.
I haven't investigated this in depth, since we aren't splitting and comparing iHH among anc/der haplotypes, I suspect it makes little if any difference.
Hope this helps!
Hi professor Szpiech,
I have some questions regarding the output of the iHH12 statistic:
After normalization, what does a negative score imply? If I remember correctly, for iHS meant selection on either the derived or ancestral haplotype. Is this the case with iHH12?
Should I then report the absolute value of iHH12, like in iHS and nSL?
Is prior filtering of only SNPs with ancestral/derived states needed for iHH12?
I'd appreciate your input on this. Best, Ram