Open MrDongZhenyu opened 4 years ago
Hi, thanks for reporting. Can you be more specific, like what do you expect to see and what's actually showing? It could help me to figure out the issue.
I think this may help. But may discuss when l=0/1. LP_transcend_func = @(x) ha(x).( besselj(l-1,ha(x))./besselj(l,ha(x)) )+qa(x).( besselk(l-1,qa(x))./besselk(l,qa(x)) ); The dispersion relation of LP mode is (in Latex)
\frac{Jl(u)}{u*J{l-1}u} = -\frac{Kl(v)}{v*K{l-1}v} (l>=2)
I think for LP modes based on weakly guidance condition, the twofold solutions degenerate from exact solutions and have the same propagation constants. It may make sense for exact solution to have conditional equations for l = 0 and l >= 0, but due to the LP mode assumption, I thought the current equation is general for all l number?
Hello, I guess something gets wrong with line79-80 in MMF_simTM_LP.m, I think it can not agree with the dispersion relation of LP modes.