t-artistik / browserscope

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/browserscope
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

IE 9 Beta 1 JS user agent parse doesn't show in results table. #275

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Your test claimed I was using "IE Platform Preview 9.0", but I'm on IE 9 Beta 1 
(Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0)).

Original issue reported on code.google.com by KeithGal...@gmail.com on 30 Oct 2010 at 3:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Hi Keith,
Any chance you might be able to hit www.browserscope.org/ua and submit, and 
then paste in the results table in to this bug?
I tried with the Beta today and it seemed to get it right..

Original comment by els...@gmail.com on 30 Oct 2010 at 3:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
IE | Beta | 9 | 0 | beta | IE Beta 9.0beta |
 Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) | 
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/5.0; SLCC2; 
.NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 
6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; Zune 4.7; Creative AutoUpdate v1.40.01) | 
IE Beta | 9 | 0 | beta

------------------------------------

This is largely a UI nitpick about your results page. I see that my first 
message didn't specify properly and specifically where I saw the problem.

I have attached a png image to show you my Opera 10.63, Firefox 4.0 Beta 6, and 
IE 9.0 Beta 1 results. On Firefox Beta 4.0b6 and Opera 10.63, the "Your Test 
Results" and "We think you're using" are the same.  But for IE9, the "Your Test 
Results" correctly says "IE Beta 9.0 Beta" while the "We think you're using" 
confusingly says "IE Platform Preview 9.0". 

Hopefully, what I said makes sense now.

Original comment by KeithGal...@gmail.com on 30 Oct 2010 at 10:13

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Thanks for the image, I think I know what's happening incorrectly here - we are 
getting the UA right in one place (at least the most important) but wrong in 
another.
-l

Original comment by els...@gmail.com on 1 Nov 2010 at 4:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
I'm glad the image helped.  Hopefully you can fix it now.

Original comment by KeithGal...@gmail.com on 3 Nov 2010 at 8:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
We fixed this post v1

Original comment by els...@gmail.com on 16 Jun 2011 at 12:21