Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Looks like a dup of an already reported gcc44-related issue:
http://code.google.com/p/qtscriptgenerator/issues/detail?id=37
(with patch)
Original comment by rdieter@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2009 at 1:44
Ok, with the patch I can compile generator, but no qtbindings:
cd qtscript_core/ && make -f Makefile
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/fraga/src/qtscriptgenerator-src-0.1.0/qtbindings/qtscript_core'
make -f Makefile.Release
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/fraga/src/qtscriptgenerator-src-0.1.0/qtbindings/qtscript_core'
g++ -c -m64 -pipe -O2 -Wall -W -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_SCRIPT_LIB
-DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_SHARED
-I/usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.5.1/mkspecs/linux-g++-64 -I.
-I/usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.5.1/include/QtCore
-I/usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.5.1/include/QtGui
-I/usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.5.1/include/QtScript
-I/usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.5.1/include -I. -Irelease -I. -o
release/qtscriptshell_QFutureIterator.o
../../generated_cpp/com_trolltech_qt_core/qtscriptshell_QFutureIterator.cpp
../../generated_cpp/com_trolltech_qt_core/qtscriptshell_QFutureIterator.cpp: In
constructor 'QtScriptShell_QFutureIterator::QtScriptShell_QFutureIterator()':
../../generated_cpp/com_trolltech_qt_core/qtscriptshell_QFutureIterator.cpp:10:
error: no matching function for call to
'QFutureIterator<QScriptValue>::QFutureIterator()'
/usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.5.1/include/QtCore/qfuture.h:191: note: candidates
are:
QFutureIterator<T>::QFutureIterator(const QFuture<T>&) [with T = QScriptValue]
/usr/local/Trolltech/Qt-4.5.1/include/QtCore/qfuture.h:191: note:
QFutureIterator<QScriptValue>::QFutureIterator(const
QFutureIterator<QScriptValue>&)
make[2]: *** [release/qtscriptshell_QFutureIterator.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/fraga/src/qtscriptgenerator-src-0.1.0/qtbindings/qtscript_core'
make[1]: *** [release] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/fraga/src/qtscriptgenerator-src-0.1.0/qtbindings/qtscript_core'
make: *** [sub-qtscript_core-make_default] Error 2
Original comment by frag...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2009 at 2:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
frag...@gmail.com
on 24 Apr 2009 at 7:23