t3dotgg
commented
2 years ago It really doesn't need to be so heavy, I wanted it to "use the stack it recommended" but that doesn't fit my best tool for the job philosophy well.
Cut #12 for this
Closed Daniel15 closed 2 years ago
t3dotgg
commented
2 years ago It really doesn't need to be so heavy, I wanted it to "use the stack it recommended" but that doesn't fit my best tool for the job philosophy well.
Cut #12 for this
juliusmarminge
commented
2 years ago Resolved by #14
It loads ~280KB of stuff (scripts, etc) for what is essentially just a static website. It doesn't seem to have interactivity that would need that much JS to be loaded? Is it supposed to just be an example of how one would start working on something more sophisticated?
This seems to be becoming an issue in general with web frameworks, as I've seen several landing pages with huge amounts of JS that don't actually need all the JS.