tostart-pickagreatname
commented
7 years ago Let me know what you think of the idea. We can certainly add more complexity to specifying messages (arguments, etc.), but I wanted to start simple so we could discuss it.
Purpose: Allow a property to specify a type by its method names to ensure that later calls to those names succeed without needing to specify a specific class. This would put the focus on behaviour and interface. Right now if I want to mixin behaviour to a number of classes and allow a class to work with all those examples I must use inheritance or generate a long list of classes that can be accepted, or avoid checking acceptance.