Closed BrianLandry closed 8 years ago
To elaborate on (2):
As Brian correctly said, we've discussed this extensively, and the suggested name change is not a good idea. Doesn't mean there aren't better names, but any other name/label needs to distinguish between two very different things: (1) the physical wells being used by the experiment in the plate, and (2) the abstract wells (number of wells) and are described by a particular experiment.
I'd say that "Samples" doesn't do a good job of this, but it's better than anything with the word 'wells' in the label.
I think it would be better to only show total wells used instead of a range that we currently show since the range doesn't add any useful information. Thoughts?
We lose some information with that, but I think the simplification that would bring would be well worth it
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015, 9:16 PM felixekn notifications@github.com wrote:
I think it would be better to only show total wells used instead of a range that we currently show since the range doesn't add any useful information. Thoughts?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/rice-bioe/Iris/issues/266#issuecomment-168114585.