This is a more correct approach to check if some command is present since it doesn't print anything to stdout if the command isn't present.Use command -v instead of which. This is focuses on suppressing the error messages produced by which:
zneix@uds ~/a/pass-otp (master)$ pass otp otp/discord
which: no otptool in (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin/site_perl:/usr/bin/vendor_perl:/usr/bin/core_perl:/home/zneix/.local/bin:/home/zneix/scripts:/home/zneix/.local/share/go/bin)
821264
zneix@uds ~/a/pass-otp (master)$
This is a more correct approach to check if some command is present since it doesn't print anything to stdout if the command isn't present.
More reference: https://stackoverflow.com/a/37056347
Update version variable
Last git release is 1.2.0 and the variable itself was outdated
Nevermind, duplicate of #116, #123, #159... I really think command -v is a better approach than which but oh well.
This is a more correct approach to check if some command is present since it doesn't print anything to stdout if the command isn't present.Use
command -vinstead ofwhich. This is focuses on suppressing the error messages produced bywhich:This is a more correct approach to check if some command is present since it doesn't print anything to stdout if the command isn't present. More reference: https://stackoverflow.com/a/37056347
Update version variable Last git release is 1.2.0 and the variable itself was outdated
Nevermind, duplicate of #116, #123, #159... I really think
command -vis a better approach thanwhichbut oh well.