tagyoureit / nodejs-poolController

An application to control pool equipment from various manufacturers.
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
327 stars 97 forks source link

[BUG] ORP Tank resetting to Empty after trying to add more to the tank #721

Closed camaro4life18 closed 9 months ago

camaro4life18 commented 1 year ago

nodejs-poolController Version/commit

8.0.1

nodejs-poolController-dashPanel Version/commit

8.0.0

relayEquipmentManager Version/commit

Latest as of 4/17/2023

Node Version

v16.19.1

Platform

Linux poolcontroller 6.1.21-v8+ #1642 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 3 17:24:16 BST 2023 aarch64 GNU/Linux

RS485 Adapter

Industrial USB to RS485

Are you using Docker?

OCP

Nixie

Pump(s)

Hayward Super Pump VS 700

Chlorinator(s)

Ezo Pump

What steps will reproduce the bug?

ORP Tank is at empty. 1) Click on Chemistry 2) Click on ORP Tank 3) Set to 4 Gallons (Max is 5) 4) Click Save 5) Wait a few seconds 6) Click on Dose Chlorine 7) Dose any amount

What happens?

An exception is thrown saying ORP tank is empty. Sometimes just waiting for a time period the ORP tank just shows empty. It does show the 4 gallons after you save the new level, but eventually goes back to empty.

ApiError: The ORP tank is empty at NixieChemicalORP.manualDoseVolumeAsync (/appl/nodejs-poolController/controller/nixie/chemistry/ChemController.ts:2014:61) at NixieChemController.manualDoseAsync (/appl/nodejs-poolController/controller/nixie/chemistry/ChemController.ts:489:32) at NixieChemControllerCollection.manualDoseAsync (/appl/nodejs-poolController/controller/nixie/chemistry/ChemController.ts:29:21) at NixieChemControllerCommands.manualDoseAsync (/appl/nodejs-poolController/controller/boards/SystemBoard.ts:4918:39) at /appl/nodejs-poolController/web/services/state/State.ts:100:61 at Layer.handle [as handle_request] (/appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/layer.js:95:5) at next (/appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/route.js:144:13) at Route.dispatch (/appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/route.js:114:3) at Layer.handle [as handle_request] (/appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/layer.js:95:5) at /appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:284:15 at Function.process_params (/appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:346:12) at next (/appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:280:10) at /appl/nodejs-poolController/web/Server.ts:749:25 at Layer.handle [as handle_request] (/appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/layer.js:95:5) at trim_prefix (/appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:328:13) at /appl/nodejs-poolController/node_modules/express/lib/router/index.js:286:9

What should have happened?

The tank should stay at entered level until dosing starts.

Additional information

replay (6).zip

camaro4life18 commented 1 year ago

I found a work around by going through REM and adding volume there.

rstrouse commented 1 year ago

Are you using the Atlas EZO-PRS?

camaro4life18 commented 1 year ago

Yes

On Mon, Apr 17, 2023, 7:55 PM rstrouse @.***> wrote:

Are you using the Atlas EZO-PRS?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/tagyoureit/nodejs-poolController/issues/721#issuecomment-1512249141, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFI3JTD37TIHHBAKPQISCWTXBXKA7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAXBO5LRI . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

rstrouse commented 1 year ago

Ahah. That is why I was baffled. I will double check the code to make sure we are forwarding that to REM when it involves a PRS.

camaro4life18 commented 1 year ago

I never would have guessed that would interfere. I'm working on keeping Atlas in business. Screenshot_20230417-203502

rstrouse commented 1 year ago

I mistyped I had the PRS in my head. I am referring to the EZO-PMP.

camaro4life18 commented 9 months ago

Closing this as I'm no longer seeing the issue.