Closed taijusti closed 9 years ago
i can change the directives to in E and KKT pipelines to pipeline II=1 if you don't wanna.
No its okay I want to do them
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Justin notifications@github.com wrote:
i can change the directives to in E and KKT pipelines to pipeline II=1 if you don't wanna.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/taijusti/sleep_apnea/issues/1#issuecomment-95740817.
ok
should this be closed? btw, the SW implementation gives different results than the HW implementation i think? i'm trying to get device_tb.c to work right now to test my stuff.
it is compatible now, but I also got co/simulation failure when I tried c against RTL simulation of the device_tb.c. However, the test bench for the kernel passes the co/simulation. Did the co-simulation of device_tb.c pass before (with the dummy kernel)?
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Justin notifications@github.com wrote:
should this be closed? btw, the SW implementation gives different results than the HW implementation i think? i'm trying to get device_tb.c to work right now to test my stuff.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/taijusti/sleep_apnea/issues/1#issuecomment-96299228.
yup, it passed with the dummy kernel, its because sw_k() inside of device_tb needs to be replaced with the updated one. sw_k() computes the kernel value of one pair of points. could you update this?
I update device_tb.c locally, but it still doesn't pass co-simulation. The mismatch is in the E values. I will check what is wrong on Tuesday.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Justin notifications@github.com wrote:
yup, it passed with the dummy kernel, its because sw_k() inside of device_tb needs to be replaced with the updated one. sw_k() computes the kernel value of one pair of points. could you update this?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/taijusti/sleep_apnea/issues/1#issuecomment-96426195.
does it pass c-simulation?
now it passes c-simulation, I committed the changes.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:31 AM, Justin notifications@github.com wrote:
does it pass c-simulation?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/taijusti/sleep_apnea/issues/1#issuecomment-96512328.
nice! should we close issue?
yes I think we should. Did you try it ?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Justin notifications@github.com wrote:
nice! should we close issue?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/taijusti/sleep_apnea/issues/1#issuecomment-96684509.
c-sim passed. i killed co-sim after 5 minutes or so--i'm guessing it doesn't like expf. should be ok though. closing. just re-open if you have something.
K engine interface needs to be made compatible with device.c. device_tb.c should pass.