taikoxyz / taiko-mono

A based rollup. 🥁 🌸
https://taiko.xyz
MIT License
4.53k stars 2.17k forks source link

zk-Identity Adoption For Taiko Protocol With zkMe #15974

Closed Mirtah69 closed 6 months ago

Mirtah69 commented 8 months ago

Abstract

Currently, anti-sibyl protection measures are one of the biggest issues for projects with great interest in the community, as is the case of Taiko. In this way is essential to solve this problem with balanced measures between anonymity and personal data privacy, which are sensitive exposures for the user, in a low-cost way that only involves costs for transactions on the Taiko network, but that are also not weak measures that malicious parties can take advantage of by claiming false identities.

A way to address this issue is by adopting zkMe product to add value in the anti-sibyl messures already taken with the Galxe Passport in the Taiko campaign "Trust Bonus" with approximately 417K users at the moment. Becoming another option for users who wants to go through private verification without disclousing personal information, not even to zkMe.

Introduction

zkMe is a decentralized web3 credential network that leverages the power of zero-knowledge proofs to enable secure and private credential issuance and verification, ethos and vision that aligns with Taiko standards. In this way users can disclose their credentials to Taiko, without compromising their privacy, and enjoy greater control over their digital identities, adding a friendly user experience, fast set up and their mobile app.

Conclusion

What's the gain for Taiko protocol? With this adoption Taiko would win the removal of bot and fake accounts instantly with zkProof-of-Personhood, avoid jurisdiction by avoiding to onboard users of certain regions with zkGeofencing, comply with regulations by performing zkKYC and verify users' person-bound credential data through open web data attestations. In this way building possibilities with zk-credentials.

Documentation

Additional links

Spam policy

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

github-actions[bot] commented 6 months ago

This issue was closed because it has been inactive for a week since being marked as stale.