Closed willnorris closed 6 months ago
Yes, exactly. Though even if we needed to make breaking changes, I wouldn't feel too bad about it at this point. Even though the package has been out for a bit, I'd still consider it pretty experimental. But we're getting much closer to it feeling stable now.
And mostly these type names aren't really used by Caddy users. It's very very unlikely anyone is using this as a Go library at this point.
These prefixes are redundant, since this is all in the tscaddy package anyway.