Check the syntax behaviour for constant parameters.
I noticed that an empty [u:get ] node was breaking the syntax, but the syntax should be tolerant for a missing constant name because otherwise it uglifies the editing process — I happen to notice this while fast editing multiple lines, and intentionally postponing the constant names.
We want the syntax to handle such cases gracefully.
Also check the behaviour of empty [u:set ] nodes, and add dedicated tests to ensure the fixed behaviour is not broken in the future.
Check the syntax behaviour for constant parameters.
I noticed that an empty
[u:get ]node was breaking the syntax, but the syntax should be tolerant for a missing constant name because otherwise it uglifies the editing process — I happen to notice this while fast editing multiple lines, and intentionally postponing the constant names.We want the syntax to handle such cases gracefully.
Also check the behaviour of empty
[u:set ]nodes, and add dedicated tests to ensure the fixed behaviour is not broken in the future.