Closed AlexKnauth closed 9 years ago
@takikawa what do you think about this?
No specific reason, but the original behavior (putting in nfx
) is what's described in the original sweet expressions document I think. The test suite is just taken from the original implementation.
Would it be better to just bind nfx
to a macro that does this transformation?
In the video at about 04:47 here: http://readable.sourceforge.net He says that a singe datum in a curly-list is that datum and two datums are those two datums in that order.
Oh, sounds good then. Maybe the test suite was wrong or maybe I broke it at some point.
There was a test that I had to change for this, so, did you have a specific reason for not doing this?