Closed AlexKnauth closed 9 years ago
For example, have
syntax-parse stx (a ...) #:with sum #'(+ a ...) #'(define x sum)
be equivalent to
(syntax-parse stx ((a ...) #:with sum #'(+ a ...) #'(define x sum)))
instead of
(syntax-parse stx ((a ...) (#:with sum) #'(+ a ...) #'(define x sum)))
Or would that mess too much with other things when you want it wrapped in parens, or would it just be a bad idea to start special-case-ing like this?
For example, have
be equivalent to
instead of
Or would that mess too much with other things when you want it wrapped in parens, or would it just be a bad idea to start special-case-ing like this?