Thanks, but I personally don't like using the 'development status' classifiers. I'd rather people judged for themselves whether they want to rely on some code. I also don't think static per-release metadata is a good place to describe stability: something experimental might turn out to be solid, and something that's meant to be stable might run into problems later.
Thanks, but I personally don't like using the 'development status' classifiers. I'd rather people judged for themselves whether they want to rely on some code. I also don't think static per-release metadata is a good place to describe stability: something experimental might turn out to be solid, and something that's meant to be stable might run into problems later.