Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Please explain better how to reproduce this problem.
Which "latest" version do you refer? (latest development, latest on market?)
please add the version number.
Note that applications will only be blocked "by default" if you use the
white-list mode.
Original comment by rodrigo...@gmail.com
on 23 Nov 2010 at 11:21
Latest on market.
Original comment by p...@nevezen.com
on 23 Nov 2010 at 9:34
Please explain better how to reproduce this problem.
Original comment by rodrigo...@gmail.com
on 24 Nov 2010 at 11:24
Latest market version, 1.4.2. Applications are whitelisted automatically in
whitelist mode. Examples include Skyfire browser, sipdroid, audiogalaxy,
phonemarks, etc (before noticing that they weren't explicitly allowed by
default). Can't really describe in more details how to replicate this problem
but knowing that it happens with every new application installed anyway now.
Original comment by p...@nevezen.com
on 25 Nov 2010 at 1:05
So, right after installing any application it is not blocked at all? This is
pretty odd. :|
Please allow me to make some questions for researching:
1. If you open DroidWall after installing the app, is it checked in the list?
2. Are other (pre-existing) applications blocked after you install an app?
3. If you disable DroidWall and then re-enable it, is the new app blocked?
Thanks in advance
Original comment by rodrigo...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2010 at 1:23
No, droidwall is not checked on whitelist automatically. But after a
reinstall, yes.
You mean for applications on a fresh droidwall install or after a
reinstall? Initially behavior is that everything is unchecked in
whitelist.
Yes.
Original comment by p...@nevezen.com
on 25 Nov 2010 at 3:46
On #1 I meant "after installing any app" (not DroidWall itself) - I should have
made that more clear.
On #2 I was also referring as installing a new application (not DroidWall
itself).
Original comment by rodrigo...@gmail.com
on 25 Nov 2010 at 11:07
The newer issue 79 has a better report. Merging into that one.
Original comment by rodrigo...@gmail.com
on 28 Dec 2010 at 11:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
p...@nevezen.com
on 23 Nov 2010 at 7:46